AR Antulay and Varun Gandhi have recently made statements which are contrary to the basic fabrics of democracy(not my opinion).However am anxious to know the pulse of the civil society. Which was most say destructive,offensive or whatever name you give. And also remember that the former is from Madams stable and the latter a budding saffron flower.The choice is yours.
A R Antulay has actually spit on the face of this country's majority community on the basis of whose never-ending patience and tolerance Antualy and the likes of him have flourished . in no other country, minorities enjoy such status. Varun Gandhi is a reaction to the peole like Antulay, Abu Azmi and Imam Bukhari whose ingratitude has made the majority community's patience finally run out.
Antulay can not be touched as he has claimed officially that he made Sonia Maino the head of Congress ar 4 Janpath road. Second reason being he has the Muslim vote bank.As is usually said it the stupid common man who suffers in any case. The Congress spokesperson distanced himself from the statement but did not in any way disclaimed it.
Varun is the the guy who has accepted what he said and that is the quality required by todays standards,his view expressed like it or not.
Please read what he has said and you will pity the soul.
antulay statement was unfortunate while varun was communal.sharad pawar was unintentional.today manmohan washed hands off varun issue saying nsa was state matter centre cannot interfere.yesterday mulayam said sonia was blackmailing him and laloo to support her.sonia is pressurising mayawati to slap nsa on varun.
I think both are equally destructive but in different dimensions.
Antulay was never constructive.
Pseudo Seculars are scared of muslims
pseudo secularism is dangerous for the nation
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment